UK time is: 19:10:49
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Why The 4-5-1 Formation At Home?



So far this year, we've won just 3 of our 8 games at the Liberty, drawing 3 and losing the other two. Together with that poor run of form, our performances have been poor, uninspiring and boring to say the very least. I thought we were lucky to come away with all three points on Tuesday against Hartlepool, and apart from the opening 15 minutes, it wasn't a performance that warranted a top place in League One.

Thanks to our impressive away form of 6 wins in 9, we're joint top with Leyton Orient but failure to improve our results and performances at the Liberty, this season, it'll be play-offs at best for us.

After saying he wanted to prove ourselves at home, I couldn't understand why Martinez decided to go with a 4-5-1 formation, it doesn't scream ambition to me. We played with a lazy and slow striker up front and decided to crowd the midfield, hoping our wingers would get forward, though that's pointless if you have no one in the box to get on the end of their crosses.

Surely the way to improve our home form is to go with an attacking 4-4-2 formation that's proven effective for us so far, rather than having just the one striker up front - Jason Scotland, who at the moment is lazier than a snoring pig on mogadon.

It's a concern that Martinez would rather play him, on his own, up front and leave Guillem Bauza, who's in scoring form lately, and Darryl Duffy, a workhorse for us, on the bench. The Spaniard's first Jackett-esque mistake?

We also wasted too much time as it took us 71 minutes to get another striker on, plus another 9 after that to get Bauza on for Scotland, and coincidence or not, two minutes later we score, with both substitute strikers being involved before Rangel's strike.

Early on in the game, it looked as if Martinez had finally got us geared up and we got going from kick-off, something we hadn't seen at the Liberty since early September. We couldn't keep the momentum going though and Hartlepool were easily given a route back into the game.

From 8pm onwards, it was another frustrating performance to watch for the 11,000 fans. We couldn't break down a rather solid Hartlepool defence and we were limited to half chances on goal.

Rather than coming out like a moaning barsteward despite being top of the league, I still think there's major improvements to be made at home and soon enough we'll drop down a few places, when the other teams play and if we drop more valuable points at home.

A 4-5-1 formation, with the way we've been playing lately, is just asking for a point at home and it was maybe harsh on 'Pool that they lost on Tuesday night. However, we took all 3 and of course we'd take it, but we need to be far more convincing on home soil and start scoring a lot more goals if we want to finally gain promotion to the Championship.

Do you agree with our views above? Why not share your thoughts on our forum, or below via our article comments.

CLICK HERE TO SHARE YOUR VIEWS
The Journalist

Writer: KevinE Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday November 29 2007

Time: 4:14PM

Your Comments

Is there any chance Martinez would answer this? Is there any way how to get this to his eyes or ears?
Czech_Jack
To be fair, its was working well until Anderson got the knock towards the end of the 1st half. We were playing better football than we had been in the last couple of home games, but the downfall of the formation was scotland, who was shocking.
Murton_Jack
it didn't last long though MJ. About the first 15-20 minutes up until Hartlepool had their first real attempt on goal, and it was closer than what we had managed. they got back into the game and whenever they came forward our defence looked really vulnerable. I thought we got worse as the game went on.
KevinE
if he wants change formatio why not put three ufront and add bouza surly that beter than taking a striker away and playing just 1 ipfront
swans11
Yeah it started well & i agree that it went downhill a bit 2nd half, but that was more down 2 anderson's injury & scotland's decreasing work rate than the actual system. I reckon with Feeney or Bauza it would work well, its effectively 4-3-3 with two wide strikers more than 4-5-1
Murton_Jack
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Swan_Lady2 53
2. KevinE 46
3. shearers boots 38
4. keith margam 34
5. GThomas 19
6. eye_nose_hat 19
7. Phil W 15
8. ottawa_swan 13
9. justajack 3
10. forest fan 3

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Swansea 0 - 1 Southampton
Chelsea 4 - 2 Swansea
Swansea 3 - 0 WBA
Swansea 1 - 0 Burnley
Man Utd 1 - 2 Swansea

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
2. Southampton 5 3 1 1 6 10
3. Aston Villa 5 3 1 1 0 10
4. Arsenal 5 2 3 0 4 9
5. Swansea 5 3 0 2 2 9
6. Man City 5 2 2 1 3 8
7. Leicester City 5 2 2 1 1 8
8. West Ham 5 2 1 2 1 7

Breaking League News

The Sign of a Gentleman!
Chelsea : 21/09/2014 18:56:00
Liverpool: Rodgers Admits To Drop In Standards
Liverpool : 21/09/2014 18:33:00
Everton : 21/09/2014 18:21:00
Manchester City 1 Chelsea 1
Chelsea : 21/09/2014 18:05:00
Man City : 21/09/2014 18:04:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Vote for your Man of the Match vs Southampton
Suggested By:  
Fabianski 3%
Rangel 0%
Fernandez 30%
Williams 7%
Taylor 0%
Ki 46%
Shelvey 0%
Routledge 0%
Dyer 0%
Sigurdsson 0%
Bony 7%
Montero 7%