Writer: KevinE 
Date:Saturday July 15 2006
Time: 7:36PM
Our recent poll asked readers of Vital Swansea whether we should have sold Sam Ricketts or not, and if so, for how much. This is how they voted...
Prior to his �300,000 move to Hull, we asked you should we sell the Welsh International full back.
Hull increased their bid to �325,000 to activate a release clause to allow them to talk with the player. Following his move though, the Official Site later reported that the fee was �300,000.
22% voted that we should accept the �325,000 bid and sell.
27% thought we should sell but only for �400,000 or more. 16% voted that we should sell him for at least half a million.
The remaining 35% disagreed and said he should not have been sold.
Our new poll wants to know your opinion on the recent signing of Dean Leacock for �375,000. Was it a panic buy following the departure of Ricketts or does quality cost and it's money well spent? Vote now on the right hand side.
Related Articles:
Hull Sign Ricketts For �300,000
Ricketts Happy To Stay At Swansea
Hull Make �300,000 Bid For Ricketts
Arsenal Close To £10m Williams Move? (Friday May 24 2013)
Rate The Players - Swansea City 0-3 Fulham (Monday May 20 2013)
Report - Swansea City 0-3 Fulham (Sunday May 19 2013)
Line-Ups & Updates: Swansea City 0-3 Fulham (Sunday May 19 2013)
VIDEO: Top-10 Finish Bigger Than Cup Triumph (Tuesday May 14 2013)
Report - Man United 2-1 Swansea City (Sunday May 12 2013)
Line-Ups & Updates: Man United 2-1 Swansea City (Sunday May 12 2013)
Laudrup: Michu Could Return For Final Game (Saturday May 11 2013)
Laudrup Will Stay At Swansea Promises Agent (Friday May 10 2013)
383 Premier League players sign up to Support Stan (Friday May 10 2013)
| 1. | Swan_Lady2 | 135 |
| 2. | keith margam | 119 |
| 3. | justajack | 37 |
| 4. | bohana34 | 22 |
| 5. | ottawa_swan | 21 |
| 6. | shearers boots | 18 |
| 7. | Aussie_Swan | 12 |
| 8. | alexbarmy | 2 |
| 9. | viagra | 1 |
| 10. | sbulby | 1 |
| Latest Results | ||||
| Swansea | 0 | - | 3 | Fulham |
| Man Utd | 2 | - | 1 | Swansea |
| Wigan | 2 | - | 3 | Swansea |
| Swansea | 0 | - | 0 | Man City |
| Chelsea | 2 | - | 0 | Swansea |
| Swansea | 0 | - | 0 | Southampton |
| Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
| 6. Everton | 38 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 15 | 63 |
| 7. Liverpool | 38 | 16 | 13 | 9 | 28 | 61 |
| 8. WBA | 38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | -4 | 49 |
| 9. Swansea | 38 | 11 | 13 | 14 | -4 | 46 |
| 10. West Ham | 38 | 12 | 10 | 16 | -8 | 46 |
| 11. Norwich | 38 | 10 | 14 | 14 | -17 | 44 |
| 12. Fulham | 38 | 11 | 10 | 17 | -10 | 43 |
| Bent Rumours Resurface (Again)
» Fulham : 25/05/2013 18:35:00
|
| A New Regime?
» Man Utd : 25/05/2013 17:27:00
|
| Maiga to Leave
» West Ham : 25/05/2013 17:21:00
|
| Champions League Final - Match Day Moments
» Chelsea : 25/05/2013 17:13:00
|
| Biggest Mourinho Comeback Hint Yet!
» Chelsea : 25/05/2013 17:08:00
|
| Two Future First Team Coaches?
» Chelsea : 25/05/2013 16:56:00
|
| It Might Well Be Isco
» Chelsea : 25/05/2013 16:55:00
|