UK time is: 07:54:26
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Tate Hits Out At Referee's Costly Mistakes

Swansea City defender and vice-captain Alan Tate has hit out and yet more poor refereeing decisions, following Saturday's 1-0 defeat at Nottingham Forest.

The former Manchester United player says there's been so many poor decisions gone against us this season that it looks like a conspiracy.

The referee made two big decisions that didn't go in our favour on Saturday, decisions that could have made a big difference to the game and the result. Pratley was denied a stone-wall penalty, and there was a clear offside just before Forest won the corner that got them the all-important winning goal.

The Swans camp were fuming after the game and rightly so, as this is hardly the first time that we've suffered some terrible decisions from FA match officials. Tate even gives examples of some of them:

'That decision (the penalty claim) could cost us 60million as a club.

'You can excuse one or two going against you in a season, but this is getting ridiculous.

'I can tell you a few off the top of my head that have gone against us Craig Beattie not getting a penalty at Doncaster; the penalty farce at Plymouth; the free-kick for Reading's goal at their place; another penalty that Beats didn't get at home to Blackpool.

'If we had made two mistakes like he (Webster) made we wouldn't be in the team for next week. Maybe he shouldn't be reffing in the league next week.


Tate also comments on the referee's poor decisions during Saturday's game at the City Ground:

'That decision (the penalty claim) could cost us 60million as a club.

'You can excuse one or two going against you in a season, but this is getting ridiculous.

'I can tell you a few off the top of my head that have gone against us Craig Beattie not getting a penalty at Doncaster; the penalty farce at Plymouth; the free-kick for Reading's goal at their place; another penalty that Beats didn't get at home to Blackpool.

'If we had made two mistakes like he (Webster) made we wouldn't be in the team for next week. Maybe he shouldn't be reffing in the league next week.




Bookmark and Share




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: KevinE Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday March 8 2010

Time: 6:32PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
I can't beleive the reaction to a penalty not being given!!? There's neglible contact but we've all seen them given, and not gien, before, so why the big fuss? Oer 90mins we created more chances and took one right at the end, from a perfectly legitimate corner. If Tate doesn't understand the offside rule now it's changed should he really be playing at the back for a professional side!? Blackstock only becomes active in the second phase, when he's clearly not offside after it comes off the defenders head and changes direction. You need to be carefull because what with Pratley's (who was your stand out player and only real saving grace on Saturday) arrogant comments at the end too you're fast becoming a team of very poor losers.
forestfumbler
Report Abuse
09/03/2010 11:10:00

well now you can say that we are poor losers,forestfumbler,but today we did not lose we were cheated.the media agree,the comentators(both on radio and tv).now by my reconing that puts you in the minority and therefore WRONG.obviously you have bias toward forest as your team that is understandable.I have bias toward mine but what sets me and you apart is that I am also a forest fan as well as a swans fan.So I went to the game,hoping for a swansea win but thinking a point would do and losing not to bad.losing i can get over move on but when we are cheated it aint so easy.OK you played well but the ref was appalling and so were the linesmen.If I could sue them under the TRADE discriptions act i would.SORE losers no my freind just upset at injustice.
flashdavies
Report Abuse
09/03/2010 12:31:00

Well said flashdavies still think the draw was a fair result but to lose the way we did not happy
taylor2078
Report Abuse
10/03/2010 20:37:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Swansea City Articles

Jack Cork Would Be a Great Signing (Thursday January 29 2015)

Monk: I Don`t Want Another Striker (Saturday January 24 2015)

Stats: Blackburn Rovers v Swansea City (Saturday January 24 2015)

Swansea Injury Table + PL Comparisons (Friday January 23 2015)

Archived Swansea City Articles

List All Vital Swansea City Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Phil W 45
2. eye_nose_hat 34
3. shearers boots 11
4. GThomas 4
5. jonno1 3
6. 1871_Biscuit 2
7. pments 1
8. keith margam 1
9. sussexswan 1
10. PencoedJack 1

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Swansea 0 - 5 Chelsea
Swansea 1 - 1 West Ham
Q.P.R. 1 - 1 Swansea
Liverpool 4 - 1 Swansea
Swansea 1 - 0 Aston Villa
Hull City 0 - 1 Swansea

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
6. Spurs 22 11 4 7 2 37
7. West Ham 22 10 6 6 10 36
8. Liverpool 22 10 5 7 4 35
9. Swansea 22 8 6 8 -4 30
10. Stoke 22 8 5 9 -4 29
11. Newcastle 22 7 6 9 -9 27
12. Everton 22 5 8 9 -4 23

Breaking League News

Huth to join Foxes?
Stoke : 30/01/2015 05:02:00
Swansea City Agree Fee For Southampton's Cork
Swansea : 29/01/2015 20:01:00
FA Youth Cup - Chelsea 6 Swansea 0
Chelsea : 29/01/2015 19:10:00
Allardyce Talks Liverpool (a)
West Ham : 29/01/2015 18:53:00
Mutch Departs For Palace
Q.P.R. : 29/01/2015 18:46:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

What will the result be vs Southampton?
Suggested By:  
Southampton win 64%
Draw 15%
Swansea City win 21%